Some of the conclusions, however, are not supported in the body of the paper. All web sites utilized are credible. Citations Cites all data obtained from other sources.
The topic is too broad for the scope of this assignment. Paper flows with only some disjointedness. Citation style is either inconsistent or incorrect. Cursory discussion in all the sections of the paper or brief discussion in only a few sections. For the most part, ties together information from all sources.
Paper does not flow and appears to be created from disparate issues. Cites most data obtained from other sources. The writer has omitted pertinent content or content runs-on excessively. Topic focus The topic is focused narrowly enough for the scope of this assignment.
Sources include both general background sources and specialized sources. Special-interest sources and popular literature are acknowledged as such if they are cited. The topic is not clearly defined. The paper is about a specific topic but the writer has not established a position. Fewer than 5 current sources, or fewer than 2 of 5 are peer-reviewed journal articles or scholarly books.
The topic is focused but lacks direction. Paper flows from one issue to the next without the need for headings. Does not tie together information. The paper does not demonstrate that the author has fully understood and applied concepts learned in the course.
The writer provides concluding remarks that show analysis and synthesis of ideas. Does not cite sources. The paper demonstrates that the author, to a certain extent, understands and has applied concepts learned in the course. Cites some data obtained from other sources. Headings are necessary to link concepts.
Novice Integration of Knowledge The paper demonstrates that the author fully understands and has applied concepts learned in the course.
A thesis statement provides direction for the paper, either by statement of a position or hypothesis. Cohesiveness Ties together information from all sources.
Paper does not flow - disjointedness is apparent.
Sources More than 5 current sources, of which at least 3 are peer-review journal articles or scholarly books. All web sites utilized are authoritative.Grading rubrics precisely describe performance expectations.
Rubrics offer explicit criteria to help students meet learning objectives. Research Paper Rubric (Word doc) Rubric for Scoring Effective Writing (Word doc) Persuasive Essay Rubric University of Wisconsin - Stout Menomonie, WI Research Paper Rubric Name: _____ Date: _____ Score: _____ Category Exceeds Standard Meets Standard Nearly Meets Standard Does Not Meet Standard No Evidence Score Title Page Title Your Name, Teacher’s Name, Course Period, Date, Neatly finished-no errors Evidence of four Evidence of 3 Evidence of 2 or less Absent.
Term Paper Grading Rubric for Leadership and Character Development Guidelines for writing college and seminary-level term papers. If the paper does not follow these rules, the following points will be lost. Points RUBRIC FOR GRADING RESEARCH PAPERS. Example 1 - Research Paper Rubric.
Cole Library Menu Additional Navigation.
Syllabi; that qualities of the paper will “add up” to a specified score or grade or that all dimensions are of equal grading value. This rubric is developed for a specific writing assignment; it would need to be revised to describe the expectations for each.
Home › Teaching Guides › Grading › Sample Rubric for Grading a Research Paper. Sample Rubric for Grading a Research Paper [Download Microsoft Word Document] Outstanding Good Fair Acceptable; Conclusion doesn't follow from the rest of the paper. Research. Research Paper Grading Rubric Name: Course: Date: (The Psychology Department at San José State University is acknowledged for the basic structure of this form.) CATEGORY Unacceptable (Below Standards) Acceptable (Meets Standards) Good (Occasionally .Download